This long thread will not be to everyone's taste — and that's understandable. But for those who follow discussions of what influential religious groups are doing — are doing with effects on all of us — it may be of interest. The thread focuses on a recent Vatican statement closing the door, yet again, to ordination of women as deacons, a decision that has ramifications for how women are treated in society in general, given the influence of the Catholic church.
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
William Lindsey
in reply to William Lindsey • • •Christine Schenk writes:
"The statement published Dec. 4 is rife with dubious theology, not only about women deacons but about the nature of salvation through Jesus Christ. Consider this proposition:
'The masculinity of Christ, and therefore the masculinity of those who receive Holy Orders, is not accidental, but is an integral part of sacramental identity, preserving the divine order of salvation in Christ.'"
#Catholics #women #gender
/2
ncronline.org/opinion/womens-r…
William Lindsey
in reply to William Lindsey • • •"'To alter this reality would not be a simple adjustment of ministry but a rupture of the nuptial meaning of salvation.'
The gist of course is that women are not men and therefore they cannot be ordained.
This line of thinking echoes the same problematic theology that appears in other church documents denying ordination to women."
#Catholics #women #gender
/3
William Lindsey
in reply to William Lindsey • • •"Are Christians saved by maleness or by the Word of God, enfleshed in Jesus, human and divine? Jesus' maleness is irrelevant to our salvation. Framed more positively we need to understand 'Christ as representative of all humanity, not of biological maleness,' to quote Mary Grey."
#Catholics #women #gender
/4
William Lindsey
in reply to William Lindsey • • •Mary E. Hunt writes,
"In 2025, Catholic theology still requires a penis for full personhood. …
There’s something blatantly wrong with the thinking that cements women’s secondary status in the Catholic Church. These are matters that theologians debated 50 years ago. Today, the prejudices have been so thoroughly debunked that there’s nothing left to argue."
#Catholics #women #gender
/5
religiondispatches.org/marking…
William Lindsey
in reply to William Lindsey • • •"Imagine someone in law or medicine trying to argue in 2025 that fully qualified women, often the best and brightest students, cannot practice their chosen professions because of their gender. …
Today, barely a quarter of U.S. Catholics attend mass on a regular basis. Many have long since taken their leave for greener spiritual pastures."
#Catholics #women #gender
/6
William Lindsey
in reply to William Lindsey • • •"Given this latest decision by the Study Commission (and the long standing data linking decisions like this one to disaffiliation), I predict that many more Catholics will look for wisdom and spiritual care well beyond the confines of the Magisterium until the Pope and bishops are left talking to themselves while the work of ministry goes on without them."
#Catholics #women #gender
/7
William Lindsey
in reply to William Lindsey • • •"The synod’s Final Document, which Pope Francis approved on October 26, 2024, fails to address reproductive rights, effectively preventing discussion on the subject from taking place in the implementation phase.
Statistically speaking, participants in the synod likely have benefited from contraception, had abortions, or needed medical care for pregnancy loss."
~ Manuela Tironi
#Catholics #SexualEthics #SexualMorality #contraception #abortion #women
/8
theoverreachmonitor.substack.c…
Where the Synod on Synodality Fell Short
Manuela Tironi (The Overreach Monitor: A Catholics for Choice Watchdog)William Lindsey
in reply to William Lindsey • • •"In the U.S., 63% of Catholics believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, and 99% of Catholic women have used birth control at some point in their lives. And considering that 1 in 4 abortion patients is Catholic, there is no denying that abortion is a part of the life of the church."
#Catholics #SexualEthics #SexualMorality #contraception #abortion #women
/9
William Lindsey
in reply to William Lindsey • • •"The truth is that the church hierarchy’s absolute ban on abortion is only about 150 years old — and we know how old the church is, right? The Catholic church’s so-called 'constant teaching' on abortion has changed significantly throughout the ages. It was not until 1869 that the Catholic church first prohibited abortion at any stage of pregnancy, and the teaching was not codified until 1917."
#Catholics #SexualEthics #SexualMorality #contraception #abortion #women
/10
Bernard Vall
in reply to William Lindsey • • •Franceska Mann
in reply to Bernard Vall • • •Medieval theologists did not have advanced medical care. They did not know when a fetus was six weeks old.
Bernard Vall
in reply to Franceska Mann • • •I am not sure what your point is exactly ? No one claimed they did have modern ways of determining the age of a foetus that did not mean they had no idea of the approximate age.
If you are interested in a fuller discussion I refer you to pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/123483… where you can read abstracts of academic articles on the subject.
The Roman Catholic position on abortion - PubMed
PubMedNicole Parsons
in reply to William Lindsey • • •The date of that ban has significance. 1869.
The question of slavery was decided in the same decade in the USA.
The Catholic Church benefited enormously from the trade in slaves.
Forced birth policies function as bulwarks to the enslavement of girls & women, because few women want to abandon their children when they attempt escape.
Marriage, before no-fault divorce, functioned similarly, forcing women to stay in abusive marriages.
Slavery & religion are intertwined.
1/
Nicole Parsons reshared this.
CaptMorgan
in reply to Nicole Parsons • • •Nicole Parsons reshared this.
Nicole Parsons
in reply to Nicole Parsons • • •2/
There's falling birthrates, yet little discussion of why.
Why would women marry & have children when society, religion, & the law treat it as the social equivalent of selling oneself into slavery?
Marriage could be seen as partnerships of equals.
The Catholic Church could choose to welcome female support & leadership as equals, but instead retains its dinosaur ideas about dominance, hierarchy, & property.
Without a belief that all are equal in the eyes of God, what are women but slaves?
Nicole Parsons reshared this.
CaptMorgan
in reply to Nicole Parsons • • •Nicole Parsons
in reply to Nicole Parsons • • •3/
Women as property is an economic practice.
epi.org/publication/economics-…
The history of abortion bans in the USA arose from policies that wanted a maximum number of children from women slaves.
aclu.org/news/racial-justice/t…
ms.now/the-reidout/reidout-blo…
kansasreflector.com/2023/08/31…
theguardian.com/us-news/2022/m…
nbcnews.com/think/opinion/abor…
nytimes.com/2023/09/02/opinion…
legal-forum.uchicago.edu/print…
The Catholic Church's refusal to consider women as equals with agency & autonomy becomes part of the GOP's 'War on Women'
‘Enforced childbirth is slavery’: Margaret Atwood on the right to abortion
Margaret Atwood (The Guardian)Nicole Parsons reshared this.
William Lindsey
in reply to William Lindsey • • •"If the synod’s implementation phase is serious about its call to encounter each other across lines of difference, then we must talk openly and honestly about abortion, acknowledge its moral complexities, and listen to the wisdom and lived experiences of the many faithful Catholics who have abortions. The church cannot be open to the workings of the Holy Spirit on some issues while silencing conversation on others."
#Catholics #SexualEthics #SexualMorality #contraception #abortion #women
/11