Next time, someone should encourage MacKenzie Scott or Melinda Gates to buy newspapers and make presidential endorsements.
Meanwhile, we're not going back!
townandcountrymag.com/society/…
#WomensOpportunities #VoteSmart #USpol #USpolitics #USelections #election #elections #Harris #Walz #HarrisWalz #vote #VoteBlue #philanthropy
The MacKenzie Effect: How Billionaire MacKenzie Scott Is Changing the Giving Game
A $36 billion fortune made Scott one of the richest women in the world. How she’s giving it away makes her fascinating.Andrew Zucker (Town & Country)
brad m
in reply to Rich Stein (he/him) • • •Not great if we depend on billionaire v billionaire
brad m
in reply to brad m • • •“[U]nelected individuals do not have the legitimacy to single-handedly alter public policy, no matter how vast the private fortune they have amassed”
Opinion | The hard truth: Americans don't trust — or need — billionaires lawdork.com/p/opinion-the-hard… by @chrisgeidner
Opinion | The hard truth: Americans don't trust — or need — billionaires
Chris Geidner (Law Dork)Rich Stein (he/him)
in reply to brad m • • •Totally agree. In this case, both women did not plan to be billionaires or "masters of the universe." Rather, they came into money as a result of marriage and subsequently divorce. Also, both have indicated an inclination to do philanthropic work and be done – M.G. (Giving Pledge) and M.S. have said as much. Gates has made a career (through marriage) of philanthropy. Scott had a previous career as an author.
I'm not advocating for billionaires in any way.
1/n
Rich Stein (he/him)
in reply to Rich Stein (he/him) • • •2/2