Skip to main content


šŸ˜³ā€œA New York appeals panel on Thursday appeared wary of the stateā€™s civil fraud case against #Trump that ended in a $464 million judgment against him and his business.

During arguments lasting more than an hour, the five-judge panel on the Appellate Division ā€” New Yorkā€™s midlevel appeals court ā€” questioned whether any constraints apply to the law New York Attorney General Letitia James used against Trump.ā€ 1/...
trib.al/Lsw5n7f

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Laffy

2/ Via @Brandi_Buchman:

So, TL;DR: Judges seem dubious that the penalty of $489M should stick; the opinion is likely to be split in any event, and I wouldn't say that the majority seemed to favor the prosecution today. Will be a bit of time before we get a ruling back.

in reply to Laffy

3/ Via Pagliery:

Somehow, the same appellate judge who keeps siding with Donald Trump landed on the panel that could overturn his bank fraud judgment.

He interrupted the AG's office so often that two fellow jurists had to cut in.

in reply to Laffy

The Nazis knew they needed to control the courts to raise their Third Reich.

The GOP are following the same game plan. Republican judges are putting party over the law.

in reply to Laffy

Imagine the covert pressure campaigns on these judges...

Republican megadonors are one step away from acting like Russian oligarchs who Trump emulates.
thesun.co.uk/news/26152417/rusā€¦
telegraph.co.uk/world-news/202ā€¦
rferl.org/a/judge-dies-russia-ā€¦
newsweek.com/russia-judge-deadā€¦
newsweek.com/putin-ally-issuesā€¦
reuters.com/world/europe/russiā€¦

Nicole Parsons reshared this.

ā‡§