His comments on the Electoral College caught the ears of some Republicans who might be swayed to Harris but are horrified at the prospect of losing the only way they can win the presidency in the future. Therefore, a reasonable answer can be seen as threatening by some.
The NYT has its own hands full trying not to say stupid things. It's not winning that battle.
Its headline writers imagine, for example, that they are being cute, by repurposing a self-effacing comment from Walz to throw road apples at his campaign roadshow. What the NYT really demonstrates is that road apples are the top menu item in the executive dining room.
Michael Slade
in reply to Jeff Jarvis • • •huntingdon
in reply to Jeff Jarvis • • •The NYT has its own hands full trying not to say stupid things. It's not winning that battle.
Its headline writers imagine, for example, that they are being cute, by repurposing a self-effacing comment from Walz to throw road apples at his campaign roadshow. What the NYT really demonstrates is that road apples are the top menu item in the executive dining room.