Skip to main content


Cable companies ask 5th Circuit to block FTC’s click-to-cancel rule

Cable companies worry rule will make it hard to talk customers out of canceling.

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20…

Nicole Parsons reshared this.

in reply to Ars Technica

Want to keep customers then treat them well, cut the crap and if you want to keep them then make it worth our while.
in reply to Ars Technica

Yet another reason to despise your cable company and cut the cord.
in reply to Ars Technica

Much easier to get the courts to keep cancelling a complex operation rather than trying not to make customers want to cancel.

Why do people keep doing business with companies that treat you like crap?

in reply to Ars Technica

Their court filing:

"The Final Rule calls these "negative option" contracts [...] and deems them all to be deceptive unless they comply with [...] regulations of truthful company representative communications with customers [...]"

Cable companies know we can read this, right?

We canceled Spectrum cable internet the other day and the 15 minute customer retention babble was excruciating. When they finally ground through every line of the retention/upsell script, they then agreed to cancel. Garbage behavior.

in reply to Ars Technica

Good. Maybe cable companies should make offering good service at reasonable prices their primary retention strategy instead of tar pit tactics.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Ars Technica

Years ago I wanted to change my cell phone. Provider told me they will not sell me the phone and I have to pay over 24 months. I said no, you are allowed to buy the phone outright. They disagreed and I told them I can go to their competitor. They told me I would get told the same thing. They didn't know I checked before going to them and I COULD buy the phone. End result, I went to their competitor, bought the phone, and went with their plan that ended up costing half of what I was paying. I have stayed with them so far as they are treating me as a valuable customer!

The companies want to make it easy for you to enter into a plan, but make it so damned difficult to allow you leave that you end up giving up and living with crap.

Hopefully this will go through and the cable (and telcos) companies will have to keep their customers happy as they can easily and quickly go to another company willing to serve them.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Ars Technica

The problem here is the 5th circuit is crooked as hell.

This is why this case is being brought there.

Expect them to take the cable companies side.

in reply to Ars Technica

The FIRST thing that came to mind when I heard about this rule is WE CAN FINALLY cancel cable or cable options online. It's such a scam that they make you jump through hoops to cancel, and try to upsale you or scare you with increased costs.

You can easily add service online, just not cancel service.

It should be easier.

This is long overdue.

in reply to Ars Technica

"make it hard to talk customers out of cancelling" that's kinda the point isn't it? You can't hold your customers hostage in a service they no longer want.
in reply to Ars Technica

#TranslatedFromTheRepublican

"The corporations that funded Jan 6 like AT&T want to turn captive consumers into captive citizens.

Restrictions on competition is how the GOP accomplishes that."
newrepublic.com/article/160800…

newrepublic.com/article/159755…

reuters.com/investigates/speci…

motherjones.com/politics/2024/…

thehill.com/business-a-lobbyin…

texastribune.org/2022/10/26/at…

AT&T cheats business partners, they cheat voters.
theintercept.com/2021/04/20/at…

taftlaw.com/news-events/law-bu…

ajamie.com/press/att-owes-9-3m…

Nicole Parsons reshared this.

in reply to Ars Technica

Ah, the goddamned 5th Circuit again, shopping for judges who are already bought.