Tesla Full Self Driving requires human intervention every 13 miles
It gave pedestrians room but ran red lights and crossed into oncoming traffic.
arstechnica.com/cars/2024/09/t…
⇧
Tesla Full Self Driving requires human intervention every 13 miles
It gave pedestrians room but ran red lights and crossed into oncoming traffic.
arstechnica.com/cars/2024/09/t…
Basil
in reply to Ars Technica • • •MaybeMyMonkeys
in reply to Ars Technica • • •John Breen
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Lyle Solla-Yates
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Leta_Darnell
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Musk wanted to use Tesla cameras to spy on drivers and win autopilot lawsuits
Jameson Dow (Electrek)Bradley Stowers
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Cluster Fcku
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Paul Atkinson
in reply to Ars Technica • • •This fits with my experience as an owner*.
I’ve told friends it’s simultaneously impressive as hell and also not nearly ready. And it’s because the errors it does make are broadly not predictable. Like it’s fine, it’s good, it’s even really amazing sometimes, then suddenly WHY ARE YOU DOING THAT?! The driver really must remain vigilant.
It’s certainly not clear to me the approach they’re taking will get there eventually. It might? But…?
And there’s no way they’re changing the whole tech stack now obviously. So if not they’ll still try until the bitter end.
*Bought it before we knew he was this horrible
Geoff 🏴
in reply to Ars Technica • • •If it works to a far higher standard than a well above average driver in all possible circumstances, allow it. Otherwise get it off the damn public roads.
DRBLD2009
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Tucker's Balz 4 Harris/Walz
in reply to Ars Technica • • •What could POSSIBLY go wrong? 🥥
#Musk #Tesla #AlphaTesting #Elon #DangerWillRobinson #TuckersBalls
Condalmo.
in reply to Ars Technica • • •Lee 🌏
in reply to Ars Technica • • •