Skip to main content


Early in the pandemic (April 2020) I started what became a long #Twitter thread on #gender #bias in academic #publishing.
twitter.com/petersuber/status/…

Starting today, I'm stopping it on Twitter and continuing it on #Mastodon.

Here's a rollup of the complete Twitter thread.
resee.it/tweet/125298113985535…

Here's a nearly complete archived version in the @waybackmachine.
web.archive.org/web/2022090813…

Watch this space for updates.

#academia
@academicchatter

🧵

in reply to petersuber

Update. In political science, "journal articles authored exclusively by female scholars score 27% lower on average [on Altmetric Attention Scores, AAS] than exclusively male-authored outputs. However, men are also more likely to write articles with an AAS of zero. These patterns are shaped by the presence of high-scoring male 'superstars' whose research attracts much online attention."
link.springer.com/article/10.1…

#Altmetrics #Gender #PoliticalScience

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. "We evaluated how the #gender composition of top-cited authors within different subfields of research has evolved over time…Men outnumbered women 1.88-fold among all authors, decreasing from 3.93-fold to 1.36-fold over time. Men outnumbered women 3.21-fold among top-cited authors, decreasing from 6.41-fold to 2.28-fold over time." Imbalances varied greatly by discipline.
biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20…
in reply to petersuber

Update. "We find that sex differences in the number of publications, citations, and citations per publication were small across low and medium levels of productivity, but become more pronounced the higher the level of performance. In the top performing 10% the female proportion decreases from the average 43.2% to 26%."
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
in reply to petersuber

Update. The 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘰-𝘌𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘙𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘸 studied its own publishing history by #gender. "While no gender differences exist in overall acceptance rates for submitted papers, a substantial gender gap exists in the number of submissions."
academic.oup.com/ser/advance-a…
in reply to petersuber

Update. "Female scientists were much less likely than their male counterparts to be submitted for #assessment in the last Research Excellence Framework (#REF), according to an analysis."
timeshighereducation.com/news/…
(#paywalled)

#Gender #UK

in reply to petersuber

Update. In #PoliticalScience "mean [#altmetrics] scores are highest on average for mixed-gender authored items (30.54). Exclusively female-authored research generates, on average, the lowest scores (19.23) as compared to exclusively male-authored research (24.49)."
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial…
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. Review of _Equity for Women in Science_ by Cassidy Sugimoto and Vincent Larivière (Harvard University Press, 2023).
nature.com/articles/d41586-023…

"#Gender gaps are still with us."

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. In the field of #economics, after the #pandemic, "men and women both experienced production increases [i.e. posted more working papers] with the exception of women between the age of 35 and 49, who experienced no production gains despite large increases for men in the same age group."
academic.oup.com/rfs/article/3…
in reply to petersuber

Update. Women in analytic #philosophy 1896-1960.
aeon.co/essays/the-lost-women-…

"We looked at all the 3,288 articles that appeared in six [major analytic] philosophy journals between 1896 and 1960…On average, only 4%…were authored by women. Most of these women, 70 in number, are presently forgotten…Only four of the 246 papers presented at meetings of [Society for the Study of the History of Analytical Philosophy, #SSHAP] in the period 2015 to 2019 were about female philosophers – less than 2%."

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. New study: At least in #Germany, in the field of #economics, "men tend to seek reputation, while women favor visibility through #OpenAccess…Overall female researchers appear to contribute more to the public good of #OpenScience, while their male colleagues focus on private reputation. These findings may offer an additional explanatory channel for the academic #gender gap."
sciencedirect.com/science/arti…
in reply to petersuber

Update. New study of #editors of medical-education journals published in the global #south: "Among 1219 editors, 57.5% were men. Out of 46 editors in chief (EICs), 34.7% were women, and 60.9% were based in high income countries. No EIC belonged to low-income country. The proportion of female advisory board members was found to be positively correlated with the presence of a female EIC."
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
in reply to petersuber

Update. Anna Kristina Hultgren and Pejman Habibie (eds.), _Women in Scholarly Publishing_, a new book from Routledge.

At least temporarily free to read from this link.
google.com/books/edition/Women…

Publisher's page, suggesting that the book is not out yet and not OA.
routledge.com/Women-in-Scholar…

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. New study, my paraphrase: Gender and racial bias in academic publishing doesn't show up just in acceptance rates, citation rates, and representation rates on editorial boards. It also shows up in publishing rates during times of stress, such as the pandemic. Using publication tallies as an assessment metric can aggravate this bias.
journals.plos.org/plosone/arti…
in reply to petersuber

Update. In tension with the results above (previous toot, this thread), this study finds that "gender gaps in productivity are highly context-dependent; once scientific field, academic position, institutional affiliation and age are controlled for, most gender differences all but disappear."
taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edi…
in reply to petersuber

Update. New study: "The proportion of positive [supporting] and negative [criticizing] citations was higher for publications whose first/last authors were women (vs. men), while the opposite was true for neutral [mentioning] citations."
link.springer.com/article/10.1…
in reply to petersuber

Update. In medical journals, "women were underrepresented among authors of retracted articles, and, in particular, of articles retracted for #misconduct."
jmir.org/2023/1/e48529

#Gender #Medicine #Quality #Retractions

in reply to petersuber

Update. New study: "In three relatively #gender-balanced disciplines representing humanities (#history), social sciences (#economics), and natural sciences (#environmental sciences)" male authors consider more different journals before submission and resubmit more often after rejection.
link.springer.com/article/10.1…
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (#JPSM) studied its own publishing history and released the results.
jpsmjournal.com/article/S0885-…

"There were differences in acceptance rates by region of residence, ethnicity, and race but not by gender. Asian authors and authors residing in regions outside of North America had greater odds of rejection compared to White or North American authors."

#jpsm
in reply to petersuber

Update. New study (book chapter): "Male researchers publish more papers than female researchers & this difference increases over the course of scientific careers.…By contrast, female researchers achieve higher citation impact & publish in more prestigious journals than male researchers over the course of their careers, especially among researchers with short careers…The results suggest that many women with high potential leave the science system early in their careers."
edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/32448/…
in reply to petersuber

Update. New study using #ChatGPT to assess referee reports: "Female first authors received less polite reviews than their male peers… In addition, published papers with a female senior author received more favorable reviews than papers with a male senior author."
elifesciences.org/articles/902…

#AI #Bias #Gender #PeerReview

This entry was edited (11 months ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. "Between 2015 and 2022, our findings suggests that men [in #Germany, in #economics] tend to seek reputation, while women favor visibility through #OpenAccess, at least at the margin. While authorship in teams can dilute these behavioral patterns, female economists publish more single-authored papers. Overall female researchers appear to contribute more to the public good of open science."
doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.…

Summary by one of the co-authors:
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial…

in reply to petersuber

Update. I missed this piece from March 2022: "This research is the first to comprehensively study the 'gender solo research gap' among all internationally visible scientists within a whole national higher education system…The gender solo research gap in #Poland is much weaker than expected: within a more general trend toward team research and international research, gender differences in solo research are much weaker and less relevant than initially assumed."
link.springer.com/article/10.1…
in reply to petersuber

Update. The doctoral dissertations of women are interdisciplinary less often than those of men, and this could "hinder their [women's] career advancement."
nature.com/articles/s41599-023…
in reply to petersuber

Update. New study: "Merely increasing the proportion of women might not be sufficient to eliminate [gender] bias. Measures accounting for women’s circumstances and needs…and raising editorial awareness to women’s needs may be essential to increasing gender equity and enhancing academic publication."
journals.plos.org/plosone/arti…
This entry was edited (10 months ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. "Citation attributions exhibit gender homophily…that is, gender alignment between citing and cited authors. This pattern greatly disadvantages women in fields where they are underrepresented."
doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.…

Summary
nature.com/articles/d41586-023…

in reply to petersuber

Update. From a survey of university faculty in the US: "Males were twice as likely as females to use #AI to recommend journals to which to submit research articles."
primaryresearch.com/AddCart.as…

(Unfortunately the full results are not #OpenAccess and not even close. One copy of the PDF costs $98.)

in reply to petersuber

Update. This qualification applies to all the studies I've collected in this thread: "Different research does not understand the concepts of 'man/woman' and 'male/female' in the same way, and there is no discussion nor written consensus on how to tackle these issues ethically and correctly within #Bibliometrics."
digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/handl…

Another qualification: Most of these studies determine the sex/gender of authors by using software that makes guesses based on their names.

#Gender

This entry was edited (8 months ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. Missed this one from Nov 2017: The #OpenAccess citation advantage (#OACA) is real and it "benefits male and female political scientists at similar rates. Thus, OA negates the gender citation advantage that typically accrues to male political scientists."
doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517000…

#PoliticalScience #SSH

in reply to petersuber

Update. Nature studied its own recent publication record. It found that just 17% of its submissions were from authors who identify as women. Also found a slightly lower acceptance rate for women than for men (8% v 9%). This editorial outlines steps to do better, inc asking authors to self-report their #gender. The journal promises periodic progress reports.
nature.com/articles/d41586-024…
in reply to petersuber

Update. "Drawing on the archives of the LSE Impact Blog, this review brings together ten posts that explore the gendered nature of research and scholarly communication."
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial…

#Gender #ScholComm

in reply to petersuber

Update. In 126 pathology journals, "women made up only 18% of the 141 total editor in chief positions…Among 10 journals with 2 editor in chief positions, 5 had only men and 5 had 1 man and 1 woman. All 3 journals with 3 editor in chief positions had 2 men and 1 woman."
doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae018
in reply to petersuber

Update. "I [Cary Wu] show that articles written by women receive comparable or even higher rates of citations than articles written by men. However, women tend to accumulate fewer citations over time and at the career level."

* primary source
compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.co…

* summary
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial…

in reply to petersuber

Update. "Women publish less than men, but marriage and family obligations do not generally account for the #gender difference. Married women with children publish as much as their single female colleagues do."
doi.org/10.7312/cole21260-017
(#paywalled book chapter)
in reply to petersuber

Update. "Women's contributions [to #OpenSource software projects] tend to be accepted more often than men's. However, when a woman's gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless."
peerj.com/preprints/1733v1/

#FOSS #FLOSS #Gender

in reply to petersuber

Update. "Male faculty members typically patented their research two to ten times more often than did their female counterparts, although this rate varied by university and discipline. But when we measured the extent to which the two groups’ scientific publications were cited by patents, we found no statistically significant difference. In other words, female scientists’ work is just as close to the technological frontier."
nature.com/articles/d41586-024…

#patents

in reply to petersuber

Update. "We show that dropout rates of #mathematicians after their postdoctoral stage, which used to be higher for women, are converging on similar figures for both genders…[But] a non-negligible number of the prestigious mathematical journals…show a meager representation of women among their authors…and exhibit no signs of turnaround over the last couple of decades."
content.ems.press/assets/publi…

#Gender #Mathematics

in reply to petersuber

Update. New study: Our findings show "a significant association between female authorship and the choice of #OpenAccess publishing, indicating a female preference for open access."
link.springer.com/article/10.1…
(#paywalled)
in reply to petersuber

Update. New study: "Women’s representation has been considerably extended in the domain of [anti-doping studies] throughout the last two decades. On average, outputs with female corresponding authors yield a higher average citation score."
link.springer.com/article/10.1…
in reply to petersuber

Update. Missed this one from 2021: "Manuscripts written by women as solo authors or coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors. Although there were some differences between fields of research, our findings suggest that peer review and editorial processes do not penalize manuscripts by women."
science.org/doi/full/10.1126/s…
in reply to petersuber

Update. Missed this one from 2020: "The last three years of reported data all show women leading men in representation in #law schools in the US. This past academic year, however, ushered in a new first: women leading the masthead of each top law journal."
forbes.com/sites/erinspencer1/…

h/t #ArthurBoston

in reply to petersuber

Update. Our data show "promising advancements towards gender equity [in academic publishing]…These findings challenge an initial perception of male prolificacy. The positive trends extend to female-led research teams, highlighting a correlation between gender balance and leadership…Contrary to conventional assumptions, developing countries are exhibiting a pronounced evolution in female authorship rates."
sciencedirect.com/science/arti…
in reply to petersuber

Update. Most journals of radiology (60.3%) fail to meet even one of the #SAGER (Sex and Gender Equity in Research) criteria. However, those that did had higher journal impact factors.
ejradiology.com/article/S0720-…

#DEI #Gender #Impact #JIF

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. The journal 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 & 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘵𝘺 is calling for submissions on "the relationship between feminism, metascience, and open science."
drive.google.com/file/d/181Myc…

#Feminism #Gender #OpenScience
@openscience

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. In the humanities, in the period 2000-2014, "male academics published 2917 books (averaging 3.41 books) and the 760 female faculty members published 1918 books (averaging 2.52 books), indicating “gender disparity” in scholarly publishing."
link.springer.com/chapter/10.1…
(#paywalled)
in reply to petersuber

Update. In the field of medical informatics, "only 25% (8/32) of the EiCs [editors in chief]… are female, while females only represent 32.7% (426/1303) of the EB [editorial board] members across journals."
ebooks.iospress.nl/doi/10.3233…
in reply to petersuber

Update. "Our results indicate that the ratio of female to male authors keeps increasing steadily across disciplines. The increases are field-neutral —in other words, they are not bigger, for example, in [STEM fields]…The increases are… decelerating in time, which could suggest that the equilibrium of female to male authors may be plateauing. Finally, although the within-field gender gap is decreasing, it actually widened between fields."
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/1…
in reply to petersuber

Update. New study: "With roughly the same number of men and women in the world, we should expect this [#gender] gap to close in an equal society. But what we see in reality is a persistent gap in #physics over time."

* Summary
phys.org/news/2024-09-gender-g…

* Primary source with proposed explanation
nature.com/articles/s42005-024…

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to petersuber

Update. The Journal of Cardiac Failure switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review to increase the number of its women authors. Three years later it reports the results.
onlinejcf.com/article/S1071-91…
(#paywalled)

"The proportion of women first authors increased from 24% in Era 1 to 34% in Era 2 to 39% in Era 3 while the percentage of women authors serving in a senior authorship role remained fairly stable over time around 21-22%."